From 32214de6484696569ef10c1be04b1fa392b6f043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Gackstatter Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:11:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove notes --- tips/TIP-0043/tip-0043.md | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tips/TIP-0043/tip-0043.md b/tips/TIP-0043/tip-0043.md index ec6e8b378..270ad2daa 100644 --- a/tips/TIP-0043/tip-0043.md +++ b/tips/TIP-0043/tip-0043.md @@ -554,12 +554,6 @@ sweep what the NFT owns in the ledger before burning it._ - All Unlock Condition imposed transaction validation criteria must be fulfilled. - All Feature imposed transaction validation criteria must be fulfilled. -## Notes - -- It would be possible to have two-step issuer verification: First NFT is minted, and then metadata can be immutably - locked into the output. The metadata contains an issuer public key plus a signature of the unique `NFT ID`. This way a - smart contract chain can mint on behalf of the user, and then push the issuer signature in a next step. - ## NFT Locking & Unlocking The `NFT ID` field is functionally equivalent to `Account ID` of an account output. It is generated the same way, but it