You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I cookiecut two instances and I want to run them both depending on which project I am working on.
Current result
The second docker-compose up will fail (containers already exist). This containers will need to be removed and recreated for the second project, because the ./scripts/setup will get denied in the DB (wrong credentials).
Expected result
I understand the services should be independent, but I don't want to have to change defaults of rabbit/redis/db/es for each instance. However, if the containers names(?) are prefixed with e.g. instance name this would not happen. The second docker-compose up would not fail and both could co-exist.
Possible drawback
End up with 20k services running, but is up to each one of us to control that I guess.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
User Story
I cookiecut two instances and I want to run them both depending on which project I am working on.
Current result
The second
docker-compose up
will fail (containers already exist). This containers will need to be removed and recreated for the second project, because the./scripts/setup
will get denied in the DB (wrong credentials).Expected result
I understand the services should be independent, but I don't want to have to change defaults of rabbit/redis/db/es for each instance. However, if the containers names(?) are prefixed with e.g. instance name this would not happen. The second
docker-compose up
would not fail and both could co-exist.Possible drawback
End up with 20k services running, but is up to each one of us to control that I guess.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: