Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Examine if using google s3 storage is faster than minio locally #68

Open
C-Loftus opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Examine if using google s3 storage is faster than minio locally #68

C-Loftus opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@C-Loftus
Copy link
Member

C-Loftus commented Jan 7, 2025

For our use case we aren't particularly concerned with the uptime or distributed properties of a hosted s3 storage provider.

We are recrawling in an immutable way and none of our operations are stateful. Given the fact that any remote s3 is going to introduce latency it might not actually be useful to use it. It may be faster to just run with minio.

It could be interesting to time the crawl with minio vs a remote s3 provider and see if there is a difference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant