You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like the source for a ...-haddock derivation is built by pulling a subset of the package source, and it's not bringing across everything it should — glib contains System/Glib/Types.chs (which I assume is compiled to .chi at some point).
Steps To Reproduce
The attached tarball contains a flake. Unpack it and run nix develop on x86_64-linux, and it should fail. Setting withHoogle = false; will let you to enter the development shell.
Expected behavior
Development shells with Haddock should be available for packages containing .chs files. glib-repro.tar.gz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Describe the bug
Builds of
...-haddock
derivations (of packages containing.chs
files?) fail due to missing.chi
files:It seems like the source for a
...-haddock
derivation is built by pulling a subset of the package source, and it's not bringing across everything it should —glib
containsSystem/Glib/Types.chs
(which I assume is compiled to.chi
at some point).Steps To Reproduce
The attached tarball contains a flake. Unpack it and run
nix develop
onx86_64-linux
, and it should fail. SettingwithHoogle = false;
will let you to enter the development shell.Expected behavior
Development shells with Haddock should be available for packages containing
.chs
files.glib-repro.tar.gz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: