Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standalone/Webplayer Outlook? #5

Open
bfowle opened this issue Oct 2, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Standalone/Webplayer Outlook? #5

bfowle opened this issue Oct 2, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@bfowle
Copy link

bfowle commented Oct 2, 2013

Hello, first off- great work!
I was wondering if there was still hope for a standalone/webplayer version in the future. I personally do not have Pro versions of Android/iOS and Unity made .NET Sockets Pro-only features... thus cannot perform a build to run with feature files.
Cheers~

@imkira
Copy link
Owner

imkira commented Oct 11, 2013

Standalone would be possible if we make a driver for MacOSX that is able to follow a few set of commands (send these mouse click/drag events to this window, send these keystroke events to this window, run app, terminate app, etc.). WebPlayer maybe also possible but I believe I would have to redesign cukunity's architecture in order to accomodate for the webplayer limitations (running inside a browser and within some security and technical limitations).

@bfowle
Copy link
Author

bfowle commented Oct 11, 2013

Thanks for the reply! IMO - the Standalone would be the top priority for me, rather than the Webplayer (especially if a full redesign to the architecture is necessary) - as an alternative to the iOS/Android versions. The main reason being, again, the .NET Sockets are Pro-only versions of Android/iOS so having an alternative to test on would be ideal.

@beorn
Copy link

beorn commented Dec 26, 2014

How about a version able to drive the Unity Editor in play mode?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants