Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update python Interface for DirichletValues #277

Closed
3 tasks done
henrij22 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

Update python Interface for DirichletValues #277

henrij22 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New request to enhance existing features python Bugs / enhancements for the python bindings
Milestone

Comments

@henrij22
Copy link
Collaborator

henrij22 commented Mar 8, 2024

The python interface for dirichlet values as far as I can see doesn't allow to fix DOFs, that are not part of the boundary .
Normally I would have assumed that


could fix other values, but this forwards to

 self.fixBoundaryDOFs(f);

This is in contrast to the interface that the C++ class has, where

void fixDOFs(F&& f) {

does somthing else.

  • Change interface to be more flexible
  • Check if python bindings for subspacebasis are working
  • Write a dirichletvalues test

Update 01.07.24

Most of this is fixed with #305 , only fixing non-boundary-dofs is not yet adressed properly

@henrij22 henrij22 added enhancement New request to enhance existing features python Bugs / enhancements for the python bindings labels Mar 8, 2024
@henrij22 henrij22 self-assigned this Mar 8, 2024
@henrij22 henrij22 added this to the v0.5 milestone Mar 8, 2024
@henrij22
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is obsolete with #305

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New request to enhance existing features python Bugs / enhancements for the python bindings
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant