You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Clause 12.3.1 of the conversion document contains 2 instances of the following bullet:
The S-101 attribute nature of construction includes the new enumerate value 11 (latticed). This information is encoded in S-57 on BCNSPP using the mandatory attribute BCNSHP value 4 (lattice beacon), which is not an allowable value for the mandatory attribute beacon shape in S-101. Data Producers will be required to evaluate their converted S-101 data and populate beacon shape with an appropriate allowable value.
I suggest changing the wording to explicitly indicate that BCNSHP value 4 will be automatically converted to nature of construction value 11 .
To avoid systematic manual editing of the S-101 data, I also suggest automatically populating beacon shape as empty (null) in such a case (multiplicity for beacon shape is (1,1)). (I don't see any current allowable value that could be used). Another option (that would require proposal to the S-101PT) would be to change the multiplicity for beacon shape to (0,1) in S-101 and then not populate beacon shape.
Thus, I suggest the following new wording:
The S-101 attribute nature of construction includes the new enumerate value 11 (latticed). This information is encoded in S-57 on BCNSPP using the mandatory attribute BCNSHP value 4 (lattice beacon), which is not an allowable value for the mandatory attribute beacon shape in S-101. During the automated conversion process, attribute BCNSHP value 4 (lattice beacon) will be converted to S-101 attribute nature of construction with value 11 (latticed) and S-101 mandatory attribute beacon shape will be populated as empty (null). Where S-57 attribute NATCON already contains one or more values, value 4 will be added to these values for nature of construction during the automated conversion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clause 12.3.1 of the conversion document contains 2 instances of the following bullet:
I suggest changing the wording to explicitly indicate that BCNSHP value 4 will be automatically converted to nature of construction value 11 .
To avoid systematic manual editing of the S-101 data, I also suggest automatically populating beacon shape as empty (null) in such a case (multiplicity for beacon shape is (1,1)). (I don't see any current allowable value that could be used). Another option (that would require proposal to the S-101PT) would be to change the multiplicity for beacon shape to (0,1) in S-101 and then not populate beacon shape.
Thus, I suggest the following new wording:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: