-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scale definitions #11
Comments
[test] seems ok for me ! |
Definitions have been aligned with S-100 5.0.0: However, this will not be true in practice, as a S-101 dataset can be displayed:
I haven't looked at other S-1XX PSs to see what is said. |
Suggest to change the definitions to:
and report to the S-100WG to align with these definitions in all related standards (S-100, S-102, S-98, etc.). |
Refer to AU comments in the S-101 PS 1.1.0 draft review:
|
The issue I see with Alvaro suggested definitions is that they are very different from the ones we find in S-100. |
UKHO comments in the S-101 PS 1.1.0 draft review: "The ownness is on the data producer to determine the MaxDS."
|
I am sharing a comment on this topic as an observation, reading the comments as above. I think that the S-100 v5.0.0 definitions are OK, as mentioned by Christian's comment on Jun 29, if looking form different angles and users of S-100 perspectives, including the needs for S-101 PS. I tend to agree that a good further explanation for encoders either in S-101 PS or in DCEG should detail out (or further refine/define) the definitions from S-100. For example the explanation after the Maximum Display Scale generic S-100 definition could be then something along the lines of: " For the navigational ENC this is the largest scale the producer has designed the data to participate in portrayal generation for ECDIS display and data analysis and calculations within ENDS (Alarms and indications, maximum MSVS, etc). At the ENC product's compilation the Producer considers this scale as the best for optimum ratio between the level of detail and the accuracy of the data to be used for safe navigation within the area of coverage. " And similarly the explanation after the Minimum Display Scale generic S-100 definition could be then something along the lines of: " For the navigational ENC this is the smallest scale the producer has designed the data to participate in portrayal generation for ECDIS display and data analysis and calculations within ENDS (Alarms and indications, maximum MSVS, etc). At the ENC product's compilation the Producer considers this scale as a threshold where the data become cluttered and unreadable from the portrayal perspective or become too detailed for any navigation related analysis and calculations in smaller scales for safe navigation within the area of coverage. " The explanations do not contradict the generic defined definitions, and are more flexible for us to fine-tune than trying to fine-tune the generic definition of S-100 to fit better S-101 PS. The explanations also better lead S-101 PS users into the ECDIS and ENC application specifics, and can therefore be more practical and beneficial during implementation. |
I think we all agree that it makes sense to have 2 levels of detail in the explanation of the terms (S100 vs PS/DCEG). They have to be consistent though. |
I suggest the following to move foward for ed 1.1.0:
|
Sub-Group meeting 2022-10-19 agreed on:
|
Consider that this issue has been resolved in S-101 Edition 1.1.0. Close. |
New definitions were agreed during Scale Sub-Group meeting 16 November 2021:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: