You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Conditional endorsements can be written such that the processing of Endorsement A depends on the acceptance of Endorsement B into the ACS. If A is processed before B, then the conditions in A will not be met.
A recursive algorithm may address this problem. If A is processed before B and A isn't accepted into the ACS, then B is processed. Once B completes, A resumes. This time it completes.
There may be other ways to solve this problem. The spec needs to describe at least one viable strategy to both document the potential for inconsistent results, but also to show a viable solution.
This probably belongs in "Ordering of Triple Processing" section (wherever it gets moved to).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Conditional endorsements can be written such that the processing of Endorsement A depends on the acceptance of Endorsement B into the ACS. If A is processed before B, then the conditions in A will not be met.
A recursive algorithm may address this problem. If A is processed before B and A isn't accepted into the ACS, then B is processed. Once B completes, A resumes. This time it completes.
There may be other ways to solve this problem. The spec needs to describe at least one viable strategy to both document the potential for inconsistent results, but also to show a viable solution.
This probably belongs in "Ordering of Triple Processing" section (wherever it gets moved to).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: