Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed an issue with the analytical solution for problem val-1d. #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2022

Conversation

humrickhouse
Copy link
Collaborator

@humrickhouse humrickhouse commented Aug 15, 2022

The diffusion coefficient in the analytical solution was incorrect; it has been re-set to 1.0 and TMAP8 is now in excellent agreement with the solution. Also updated the documentation to reflect changes to equation 7 from the original TMAP4 V&V report that were never completely propagated through to values and symbols in the accompanying text.

Refs #12

@lindsayad
Copy link
Member

lindsayad commented Aug 15, 2022

@humrickhouse love the pull request! The failure you're getting on the pre-check is because each pull request needs at least one commit that references an issue. As an example you can look at @singhgp4321's commit 227a3cc

You can either create a new issue or reference an existing issue. To edit your commit message, you can run

git commit --amend

@cticenhour
Copy link
Member

Thanks Alex! I had already mentioned this to Paul on Slack after he reached out to Gyan and myself. Should have mentioned something here after I made the review request.

@humrickhouse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ok got the issue reference in there.

@moosebuild
Copy link

moosebuild commented Aug 15, 2022

Job Documentation on f4c816c wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

cticenhour
cticenhour previously approved these changes Aug 16, 2022
Copy link
Member

@cticenhour cticenhour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dis-regard this review. Testing permissions.

@cticenhour cticenhour dismissed their stale review August 16, 2022 16:54

Invalid test review

Copy link
Collaborator

@singhgp4321 singhgp4321 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@humrickhouse Your changes look good. Could you also add the updated figure (val-1d_comparison_diffusion.png) for the comparison under doc/content/verification/figures?

@humrickhouse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I can... is there a reason not to use symlinks from the documentation to the testing directory, so the documentation is updated automatically when the tests are run?

@singhgp4321
Copy link
Collaborator

I can... is there a reason not to use symlinks from the documentation to the testing directory, so the documentation is updated automatically when the tests are run?

In my knowledge we are not doing the automatic update - currently the documentation plots have to be updated manually. @lindsayad can correct me if that's not the case.

@lindsayad
Copy link
Member

so the documentation is updated automatically when the tests are run?

I don't quite know what is meant by this. We do not run any python scripts automatically when the val-1d test suite is run, although we could. If we added python unit tests to the val-1d associated tests, then I think some symlinks would make sense

…daholab#12).  TMAP8 is now in excellent agreement with the solution.  Also updated the documentation to reflect changes to equation 7 from the original TMAP4 V&V report that were never completely propagated through to values and symbols in the accompanying text.  Updated comparison figures have been added to the documentation.
@lindsayad
Copy link
Member

@singhgp4321 you want to take a final run-through on this? If it looks good, feel free to approve and merge

@singhgp4321 singhgp4321 merged commit 17d805d into idaholab:devel Sep 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants