Add Ver 1jb to TMAP8's V&V suite

[simopier]

Ref. #12
Ref. #145

[moosebuild]

Job Documentation, step Sync to remote on 6eee844 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[simopier]

EDIT:

this issue was solved. It came from the fact that both tests added in this case were writing checkpoint files with the same name. Hence, depending on the timeline in which part 1 and recover happened, one test could end up using the checkpoint results from the other test.

This PR is fully ready for review.

---

Somehow, the recover test for the basic ver-1jb csv diff case fails.

in the normal test, I locally get:

Time Step 54, time = 1.60944e+09, dt = 3.15576e+07
 0 Nonlinear |R| = 2.411274e-09
      0 Linear |R| = 2.411274e-09
      1 Linear |R| = 7.021067e-25
 1 Nonlinear |R| = 4.598546e-24
  Nonlinear solve converged due to CONVERGED_FNORM_RELATIVE iterations 1
 Solve Converged!

Outlier Variable Residual Norms:
  tritium_trapped_concentration_scaled: 4.275653e-24

but when I run in recover mode, I get:

Time Step 54, time = 1.60944e+09, dt = 3.15576e+07
 0 Nonlinear |R| = 2.412682e-09
      0 Linear |R| = 2.412682e-09
      1 Linear |R| = 3.107300e-24
 1 Nonlinear |R| = 1.280678e-12
      0 Linear |R| = 1.280678e-12
      1 Linear |R| = 2.833365e-28
 2 Nonlinear |R| = 4.801294e-14
      0 Linear |R| = 4.801294e-14
      1 Linear |R| = 2.043024e-29
 3 Nonlinear |R| = 1.800018e-15
      0 Linear |R| = 1.800018e-15
      1 Linear |R| = 3.814858e-31
 4 Nonlinear |R| = 6.748313e-17
      0 Linear |R| = 6.748313e-17
      1 Linear |R| = 1.430223e-32
 5 Nonlinear |R| = 2.529960e-18
      0 Linear |R| = 2.529960e-18
      1 Linear |R| = 5.706847e-34
 6 Nonlinear |R| = 9.484888e-20
  Nonlinear solve converged due to CONVERGED_FNORM_RELATIVE iterations 6
 Solve Converged!

Outlier Variable Residual Norms:
  tritium_mobile_concentration_scaled: 9.484888e-20

and the time step ends up being different.

To be even more confusing, the case with equivalent concentrations of mobile and trapped tritium runs well in recover mode, when the only difference is the initial concentration of mobile tritium and trap_per_free value.

Any ideas or suggestions @cticenhour, @chaibhave, @lin-yang-ly?

Despite this issue, this PR is ready for review.

[moosebuild]

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on 6eee844 wanted to post the following:

Coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage report

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[chaibhave]

Basically good to go except for some documentation and python code changes.

[simopier]

This is not a review, just responses to @chaibhave's comments.

[chaibhave]

@cticenhour ready for your review, I'm done with all reviews. The comments left unresolved you can resolve, I'm not on the CCB yet so I don't have permissions for it.

[cticenhour]

Found a few items I'd like addressed, and I resolved the remaining comments from @chaibhave that were marked as completed.