You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current order of parameters and grouping in the available heat pump and chiller modules could irritate users, as it is not directly clear what they have to change and what they might change.
I would
move all automatically calculated parameters in a group (or tab) Calculated
move fine-tuning parameters to a group Advanced (here, smoothness and extrapolation) or group Data Handling
@FWuellhorst : I would not move all automatically calculated parameters to a separate group or tab. The pattern we usually follow is
Group related parameters in the same "group" (or "groups" if some are on another "tab").
Make sure every parameter that the user needs to enter, and every parameter that the user should see the default calculation, is on the main tab. Other tabs must not have parameters without a binding.
Special settings that may not need review are on separate "tabs", such as settings for dynamics. Here I am thinking about "Refrigerant cycle inertia", a group which could be moved from the main tab to the existing "Dynamics" tab.
I agree with your 2nd point of moving smoothness and extrapolation to a group, or tab, called Data handling
@mwetter Ok, thanks. Moving the refrigerant cycle inertia would be an option, but as the cycle itself is modelled as steady-state, I think it is important for users to explicitly neglect further dynamics.
The current order of parameters and grouping in the available heat pump and chiller modules could irritate users, as it is not directly clear what they have to change and what they might change.
I would
Calculated
Advanced
(here,smoothness
andextrapolation
) or groupData Handling
@mwetter : Any objections?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: