Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the implementation of mov() of a small literal to reigster #24

Closed
pengwuibm opened this issue Jun 10, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@pengwuibm
Copy link
Contributor

There are many use of mov() in current ppc/ code base, some are used to move from a small literal value to register: e.g., mov(r4, Operand(Smi::FromInt(0))) in code-stubs-ppc.cc

Current mov() implementation assumes the value being moved is a large literal and always use 2 instructions to move the high and low-word of the literals.

Short-term: to add more efficient sequence to load short literal
Longer-term: to replace use of mov() w/ a more intuitive name like LoadImmediate() to deal w/ loading of literals of any range. Should do this after most of the ARM sequences are converted, so low-priority for now.

@ghost ghost assigned pengwuibm Jun 10, 2013
@andrewlow
Copy link
Collaborator

This is covered by issue #92
I believe the Longer-term issue will be handled when the 64bit changes solidify.

mtbrandy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2014
call machinery.  The change replaces CallNamed, CallKeyed,
CallConstantFunction and CallKnownGlobal hydrogen instructions with two
new instructions with a more lower level semantics:

1. CallJSFunction for direct calls of JSFunction objects (no
   argument adaptation)

2. CallWithDescriptor for calls of a given Code object according to
   the supplied calling convention.

Details:

CallJSFunction should be straightforward, the main difference from the
existing InvokeFunction instruction is the absence of argument adaptor
handling. (As a next step, we will replace InvokeFunction with an
equivalent hydrogen code.)

For CallWithDescriptor, the calling conventions are represented by a
tweaked version of CallStubInterfaceDescriptor. In addition to the
parameter-register mapping, we also define parameter-representation
mapping there. The CallWithDescriptor instruction has variable number of
parameters now - this required some simple tweaks in Lithium, which
assumed fixed number of arguments in some places.

The calling conventions used in the calls are initialized in the
CallDescriptors class (code-stubs.h, <arch>/code-stubs-<arch>.cc), and
they live in a new table in the Isolate class. I should say I am not
quite sure about Representation::Integer32() representation for some of
the params of ArgumentAdaptorCall - it is not clear to me wether the
params could not end up on the stack and thus confuse the GC.

The change also includes an earlier small change to argument adaptor
(https://codereview.chromium.org/98463007) that avoids passing a naked
pointer to the code entry as a parameter. I am sorry for packaging that
with an already biggish change.

Performance implications:

Locally, I see a small regression (.2% or so). It is hard to say where
exactly it comes from, but I do see inefficient call sequences to the
adaptor trampoline. For example:

;;; <@78,#24> constant-t
bf85aa515a     mov edi,0x5a51aa85          ;; debug: position 29
;;; <@72,#53> load-named-field
8b7717         mov esi,[edi+0x17]          ;; debug: position 195
;;; <@80,#51> constant-s
b902000000     mov ecx,0x2                 ;; debug: position 195
;;; <@81,#51> gap
894df0         mov [ebp+0xf0],ecx
;;; <@82,#103> constant-i
bb01000000     mov ebx,0x1
;;; <@84,#102> constant-i
b902000000     mov ecx,0x2
;;; <@85,#102> gap
89d8           mov eax,ebx
89cb           mov ebx,ecx
8b4df0         mov ecx,[ebp+0xf0]
;;; <@86,#58> call-with-descriptor
e8ef57fcff     call ArgumentsAdaptorTrampoline  (0x2d80e6e0)    ;; code: BUILTIN

Note the silly handling of ecx; the hydrogen for this code is:

0 4 s27 Constant 1  range:1_1 <|@
0 3 t30 Constant 0x5bc1aa85 <JS Function xyz (SharedFunctionInfo 0x5bc1a919)> type:object <|@
0 1 t36 LoadNamedField t30.[in-object]@24 <|@
0 1 t38 Constant 0x2300e6a1 <Code> <|@
0 1 i102 Constant 2  range:2_2 <|@
0 1 i103 Constant 1  range:1_1 <|@
0 2 t41 CallWithDescriptor t38 t30 t36 s27 i103 i102 #2 changes[*] <|@

BUG=
[email protected], [email protected]

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/104663004

git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@18626 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
mtbrandy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2014
…drogen call machinery.

Port r18626 (d3368a4)

Original commit message:
The change replaces CallNamed, CallKeyed, CallConstantFunction and CallKnownGlobal hydrogen instructions with two new instructions with a more lower level semantics:

1. CallJSFunction for direct calls of JSFunction objects (no
   argument adaptation)

2. CallWithDescriptor for calls of a given Code object according to
   the supplied calling convention.

Details:

CallJSFunction should be straightforward, the main difference from the
existing InvokeFunction instruction is the absence of argument adaptor
handling. (As a next step, we will replace InvokeFunction with an
equivalent hydrogen code.)

For CallWithDescriptor, the calling conventions are represented by a
tweaked version of CallStubInterfaceDescriptor. In addition to the
parameter-register mapping, we also define parameter-representation
mapping there. The CallWithDescriptor instruction has variable number of
parameters now - this required some simple tweaks in Lithium, which
assumed fixed number of arguments in some places.

The calling conventions used in the calls are initialized in the
CallDescriptors class (code-stubs.h, <arch>/code-stubs-<arch>.cc), and
they live in a new table in the Isolate class. I should say I am not
quite sure about Representation::Integer32() representation for some of
the params of ArgumentAdaptorCall - it is not clear to me wether the
params could not end up on the stack and thus confuse the GC.

The change also includes an earlier small change to argument adaptor
(https://codereview.chromium.org/98463007) that avoids passing a naked
pointer to the code entry as a parameter. I am sorry for packaging that
with an already biggish change.

Performance implications:

Locally, I see a small regression (.2% or so). It is hard to say where
exactly it comes from, but I do see inefficient call sequences to the
adaptor trampoline. For example:

;;; <@78,#24> constant-t
bf85aa515a     mov edi,0x5a51aa85          ;; debug: position 29
;;; <@72,#53> load-named-field
8b7717         mov esi,[edi+0x17]          ;; debug: position 195
;;; <@80,#51> constant-s
b902000000     mov ecx,0x2                 ;; debug: position 195
;;; <@81,#51> gap
894df0         mov [ebp+0xf0],ecx
;;; <@82,#103> constant-i
bb01000000     mov ebx,0x1
;;; <@84,#102> constant-i
b902000000     mov ecx,0x2
;;; <@85,#102> gap
89d8           mov eax,ebx
89cb           mov ebx,ecx
8b4df0         mov ecx,[ebp+0xf0]
;;; <@86,#58> call-with-descriptor
e8ef57fcff     call ArgumentsAdaptorTrampoline  (0x2d80e6e0)    ;; code: BUILTIN

Note the silly handling of ecx; the hydrogen for this code is:

0 4 s27 Constant 1  range:1_1 <|@
0 3 t30 Constant 0x5bc1aa85 <JS Function xyz (SharedFunctionInfo 0x5bc1a919)> type:object <|@
0 1 t36 LoadNamedField t30.[in-object]@24 <|@
0 1 t38 Constant 0x2300e6a1 <Code> <|@
0 1 i102 Constant 2  range:2_2 <|@
0 1 i103 Constant 1  range:1_1 <|@
0 2 t41 CallWithDescriptor t38 t30 t36 s27 i103 i102 #2 changes[*] <|@

BUG=
[email protected]

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/137663005

git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@18630 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
mtbrandy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2016
Merged 1e65e20
Merged 6ea0d55

Fasterify JSObject::UnregisterPrototypeUser

Fasterify ICSlotCache

BUG=chromium:517406,chromium:517406,chromium:517778
LOG=N
[email protected]

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1282143003 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/4.5@{#24}
Cr-Branched-From: 7f21153-refs/heads/4.5.103@{#1}
Cr-Branched-From: 4b38c15-refs/heads/master@{#29527}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants