You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Item (b2) from Andre's to-do list was "Confirmation on what went intro the likelihood function (table 2) and the estimated parameters" which Rick suggested should be the focus for @k-doering-NOAA and @iantaylor-NOAA.
Here's Table 2 with some draft edits in bold:
The estimable parameters of the two models.
Parameter
Treatment in SS3
Treatment in Slice
Unfished recruitment
Estimated
N/A
Von Bert. growth parameters
Estimated
?
Recruitment
Age-0; penalty of deviations from the mean
Age-2; estimated independently
Fishing mortality
Estimated from the catch
Related to fishing effort
Selectivity
L50 and L95 estimated
L50 and L95 estimated
Likelihood components
Index
Log-normal
N/A
Length moments (by cohort)
N/A[Ian: I'm not totally sure what this means]
Length-at-age
excluded from likelihood but expected values computed for comparison with observed
Age-composition
excluded from likelihood but expected values calculated for comparison with observed
Length-composition
multinomial*
Conditional age-at-length
multinomial*
N/A
* the multinomial likelihoods in Stock Synthesis included a value of 0.0001 added to expected and observed values in each bin
@k-doering-NOAA, can you check on which parameters are estimated in the most recent model files and add some rows if needed? Feel free to modify my proposed additions above as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @iantaylor-NOAA for getting started on this. Here's a table of all the model parameters used in the Stock Synthesis EMs and whether they were estimated or not. (created using code committed in ca381b1):
Also, the ctl file that can be looked at for settings is: ctl template. It was used for the one way trip runs. This initF template was used for the baseline runs, but only differs in that it has 2 initF parameters and a different Platoon_between/within_stdev_ratio (which hopefully this setting makes sense?)
Item (b2) from Andre's to-do list was "Confirmation on what went intro the likelihood function (table 2) and the estimated parameters" which Rick suggested should be the focus for @k-doering-NOAA and @iantaylor-NOAA.
Here's Table 2 with some draft edits in bold:
The estimable parameters of the two models.
* the multinomial likelihoods in Stock Synthesis included a value of 0.0001 added to expected and observed values in each bin
@k-doering-NOAA, can you check on which parameters are estimated in the most recent model files and add some rows if needed? Feel free to modify my proposed additions above as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: