You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I use my own caffe and find the loss doesn't decrease a lot. After a period of training, nan happens. The data layer is same as predict process provided by you while label lnput is normalized to 0-1. I find that there is a Crop layer, which reshape output salient map to the shape of 'data'. However, salient map has 1 channel while data has 3 channels, why we need to make the shapes same. Is there any problem with it? Also, when I use shape 500,500 as width and height of input, nan happens very quickly while I use shape 512,512. the loss doesn't decrease a lot. It quite strange.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I use my own caffe and find the loss doesn't decrease a lot. After a period of training, nan happens. The data layer is same as predict process provided by you while label lnput is normalized to 0-1. I find that there is a Crop layer, which reshape output salient map to the shape of 'data'. However, salient map has 1 channel while data has 3 channels, why we need to make the shapes same. Is there any problem with it? Also, when I use shape 500,500 as width and height of input, nan happens very quickly while I use shape 512,512. the loss doesn't decrease a lot. It quite strange.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: