Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question: Custom type implementation #316

Closed
darrillaga opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

question: Custom type implementation #316

darrillaga opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@darrillaga
Copy link

Hi is there any way to choose a custom implementation for a type in the schema?

I'm looking for something similar to the scalars conversion, I've been reading the code and I think there isn't but I'm posting the question as last resort in case I've missed the how to.

Thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link

👋 @darrillaga
Thank you for raising an issue. I will investigate the issue and get back to you as soon as possible.
Please make sure you have provided enough context.

This library is created and maintained by me, @budde377. Please consider supporting my work and ensure our survival by donating here.

@budde377
Copy link
Contributor

There currently isn't and I think it's going to be complicated because types is not really a client side concept. What I mean by that is that an api doesn't really return a type but instead field selection on types.

Can you try and explain your use case, the more examples the merrier. then I might have a better idea of the problem.

@budde377
Copy link
Contributor

Closing because of inactivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants