You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi is there any way to choose a custom implementation for a type in the schema?
I'm looking for something similar to the scalars conversion, I've been reading the code and I think there isn't but I'm posting the question as last resort in case I've missed the how to.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
👋 @darrillaga
Thank you for raising an issue. I will investigate the issue and get back to you as soon as possible.
Please make sure you have provided enough context.
This library is created and maintained by me, @budde377. Please consider supporting my work and ensure our survival by donating here.
There currently isn't and I think it's going to be complicated because types is not really a client side concept. What I mean by that is that an api doesn't really return a type but instead field selection on types.
Can you try and explain your use case, the more examples the merrier. then I might have a better idea of the problem.
Hi is there any way to choose a custom implementation for a type in the schema?
I'm looking for something similar to the scalars conversion, I've been reading the code and I think there isn't but I'm posting the question as last resort in case I've missed the how to.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: