You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your amazing work! But I had a question, I noticed that you mentioned in your paper: "We also extend the original 3DGS to render depth" So which method do you use to render 3DGS depth? Do you render in this way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you so much! And when I try to extract the depth information of 3DGS and 2DGS, I found the performace of 2DGS is much better. Just like the following two images.
The second image depth display in flat areas is smoother. What do you think is the main reason for this phenomenon? Why the depth information of 3DGS is not correct?
Thank you for your amazing work! But I had a question, I noticed that you mentioned in your paper: "We also extend the original 3DGS to render depth" So which method do you use to render 3DGS depth? Do you render in this way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: