Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forward / Reverse / Random Order Generation / Every Nth #30

Closed
sigkill opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

Forward / Reverse / Random Order Generation / Every Nth #30

sigkill opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@sigkill
Copy link

sigkill commented Mar 8, 2022

For mask sets that are ludicrously huge, it would be awesome if the maskprocessor could support different types of output ordering. I've got a case where the data is multi PB in size, and having the ability to reverse output could help in breaking up the key-space across different hosts.

@roycewilliams
Copy link
Member

That is what --skip and --limit are for. Any apparent benefit from trying to sample from a randomly distributed attack is illusory.

@sigkill
Copy link
Author

sigkill commented Mar 8, 2022

Where are the --skip and --limit options found?

@sigkill
Copy link
Author

sigkill commented Mar 8, 2022

Reverse and forward order would be helpful in a distributed environment, but you are correct about the random order, which is not what I was requesting for in this particular case, just wanted to know if it could be supported, along with the forward and reverse generation.

@sigkill
Copy link
Author

sigkill commented Mar 8, 2022

Perhaps if I reverse the order of my custom charset?

@roycewilliams
Copy link
Member

The --markov-inverse option will start from the other end. 😄

@sigkill
Copy link
Author

sigkill commented Mar 8, 2022

The --markov-inverse option will start from the other end. 😄

AH so that is for general hashcat, but not strictly for the mask processor standalone. I'll go check it out!

@roycewilliams
Copy link
Member

Indeed - I forget it's not in mp64. In fact, I'll request that as a feature (#31)

@sigkill
Copy link
Author

sigkill commented Mar 8, 2022

Thank you. Seems like some awesome stuff I wasn't previously aware of, started researching it and went off on a tangent! Had no idea about statsprocessor too. Cool thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants