-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
claimed users need verification #44
Comments
We rely on those who add themselves to the list to remove themselves too. How else do you suggest we do it?Thanks for the analysis. Clearly some cleanup is called for. It’s hard for open source projects to promote themselves and show trust from large users.
|
Haraka permits users customize the welcome banner and |
Hello, Mail.tm is using Haraka for handling all email stuff except for JFYI there is no public email account under You can visit
The reason is that outbound is hard and it was pretty easy & free to use Yandex for our domain name. Yes, it's quite funny that we're providing email service and still using Yandex. Why not? Thanks! |
Half of the claimed large-scale users seem implausible:
fortantispam.com
has MXmail.fortantispam.com
which answers "Exim"mirusresearch.com
has MXaspmx.l.google.com
threatwave.com
has MXus-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
(along with several other SMTP server vendors & projects!);Only
cloudron.io
andemailitin.com
have MXes that mentionHaraka
in their welcome banners. They then responds toQUIT
with the messageclosing connection. Have a jolly good day.
, which is also the response given bycraigslist.com
andduck.com
so it seems reasonable to assume those four services are actually running Haraka.Edit:
Note that these are not definitive, as services may use one mailer for inbound and a different one for outbound.
For example, as previously noted that
mail.tm
has MXmx.yandex.net
, howeverin.mail.tm
is indeed running Haraka (see reply below).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: