Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Channel description of the Non-Diegetic Audio Box #166

Open
kodawah opened this issue May 2, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Channel description of the Non-Diegetic Audio Box #166

kodawah opened this issue May 2, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@kodawah
Copy link
Contributor

kodawah commented May 2, 2017

The Non-Diegetic Audio Box description is a little confusing and leaves too much to the implementation.

When present, provides additional information about the non-diegetic audio content contained in this audio track.

What does this mean? What is "additional information", given that the box only contains a version field? I would understand "if present, means <...>". but that's not what it says.

audio which should remain unchanged by listener head rotation; e.g., narration or stereo music.

Does this mean the layout can be mono or stereo? Or only either one is supported? If stereo is supported which channel is the left one and which is the right one? Does it have to be read from chan? If so, it should be mentioned in the description.

@kodawah
Copy link
Contributor Author

kodawah commented Dec 1, 2024

this is not completed

@jamiesonpepper
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry as noted in the other issue you commented on @kodawah I am currently the only active maintainer and am mostly attempting to keep the binaries functional as newer releases of Python come out.

I won't repeat my other comments other than to say my hope is that it will make the tools more accessible to everyone and less dependent on OS or architecture specific requirements. I'll re-open this for now but I'm sorry that I probably cannot answer your question to the detail you would like.

@jamiesonpepper jamiesonpepper reopened this Dec 2, 2024
@kodawah
Copy link
Contributor Author

kodawah commented Dec 2, 2024

no worries, i imagined you were doing some spring (winter?) cleaning for the tools, I was just surprised since this is a specification bug, not a tooling one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants