-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Project abandoned / dead / maintained? #143
Comments
@jmthomas just recently I made the decision to do final cleanup on #80 and merge it into my fork's I'm willing to maintain my fork, or possibly shepherd it within the WordPress organization. still would rather that @NeilFraser provide guidance here, or provide some way to keep this repo active. otherwise I would invite you to try my branch out or follow my fork once I merge it. |
@dmsnell given that it's been 4 years since the last main update, I think a fork is fine. 😂 Would be awesome to see a fork land and have the JS version published to npm and modularized. |
@dmsnell we're looking to use this library in an upcoming TinyMCE feature, we would very much appreciate if you could maintain a fork. Your branch works very well in our testing. |
We're going to try moving ahead with a private deployment of the fork (it's for a closed-source feature). We aren't planning to customise it, so we will switch to a public fork should one become available. |
All: I have now merged in my own fixes for the split-surrogate issue and it's in my fork's I will do my best to be responsive and active, though my time is also limited. Your contributions are invited at dmsnell/diff-match-patch and I'll see what I can do to slowly address the backlog of PRs open on this repo. @dylans sounds great. would you be willing to help publish an |
Fantastic! I haven't had a chance to finalise our private copy yet, so I will gladly switch to yours 👍 I completely understand that this means using your github project, not google's, from here on out. |
@TheSpyder please be aware that there is no |
That will be not be harder than what I was trying to do already 😂 |
@NeilFraser, @nikolas, @alur: Is this project still active? I haven't seen any commits for 4 yrs. This is an awesome library that a lot of downstream tools are using so I hope that it is still actively maintained. If it is not maintained is there something new that Google has moved on to that the community should consider? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: