We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following popped up when doing extensive benchmarking, so by creduce we get:
//SKIP PARAM: --set ana.activated[+] apron --set ana.apron.domain octagon --set sem.int.signed_overflow assume_none #include <pthread.h> #include <stdlib.h> long *a; pthread_t e; void* b() { long c = *a; for (; (void*)0;) c=c; } int main() { a = malloc(sizeof(long)); pthread_create(&e, 0, b, 0); }
This gives us a [Error][Analyzer][Unsound] both branches over condition '(void *)0' are dead (line:10:7-10:19) , which is the void* bit
[Error][Analyzer][Unsound] both branches over condition '(void *)0' are dead (line:10:7-10:19)
I have not much time right now to debug this myself, so I put it in an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This seems to be the same thing as #1440 came to.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Does #1492 fix the issue?
Actually it does, you are right
mutex-meet
Great to hear!
Maybe this can serve as another regression test, then.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The following popped up when doing extensive benchmarking, so by creduce we get:
This gives us a
[Error][Analyzer][Unsound] both branches over condition '(void *)0' are dead (line:10:7-10:19)
, which is the void* bitI have not much time right now to debug this myself, so I put it in an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: