wfs-service: use a no-op LayerGroupContainmentCache #468
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
groldan
force-pushed
the
wfs/noop-layergroupcontainmentcache
branch
3 times, most recently
from
83061a5 to
468089a
Compare
The wfs-service contributes a no-op `LayerGroupContainmentCache` to avoid the runtime overhead of building up the cache at startup, and the unnecessary memory footprint. `LayerGroupContainmentCache` is a securtity subsystem aid and WFS does not deal with `LayerGroupInfo` at all.
groldan
force-pushed
the
wfs/noop-layergroupcontainmentcache
branch
from
468089a to
6483a04
Compare
|
Superseded by #469 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The wfs-service contributes a no-op
LayerGroupContainmentCacheto avoid the runtime overhead of building up the cache at startup, and the unnecessary memory footprint.LayerGroupContainmentCacheis a securtity subsystem aid and WFS does not deal withLayerGroupInfoat all.