-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add multithreading support to Multi* geometries #1265
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
32e0143
Add multithreading support to Multi* geometries
urschrei 6df4c2f
Update multithreading flag docs
urschrei 1137aef
Add multithreading feature to geo-types top-level docs
urschrei df64658
Fix feature name
urschrei 76200e7
Remove needless comments
urschrei 2c2141d
Add some sanity / ergonomic tests for the multithreading impls
urschrei 7f6b16a
Feature-gate multithreading tests
urschrei 416b5c8
Omit let bindings hated by Clippy
urschrei File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The consuming
into
implementation makes sense to me.And I can see how the ref and mut flavors below provide necessary non-consuming functionality. But what does it look like to use it? Can you include some example code in your PR that uses these new methods to make the new interface easier to evaluate?
My guess is that you'd need to do something like
(& my_multi_line_string).into_par_iter()
and
(&mut my_multi_line_string).into_par_iter()
?
Which is a bit rough. I'm afraid people will just end up
my_multi_line_string.clone().into_par_iter()
out of confusion.Would it get better if we got rid of these two ref/mut implementations and instead implemented
rayon::IntoParallelRefIterator
andrayon::IntoParallelRefMutIterator
which seem purpose built for this?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm. These work with the current impls:
I admittedly didn't see the
rayon::IntoParallelRefIterator
and just adapted our existing iterators torayon::IntoParallelIterator
, but I'm confused byThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh splendid! They're already implemented by the blanket impl!
I'm glad that users will be able to do:
vs. the slightly more arcane:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah the latter two were just to make sure "everything" worked. Thanks for the sanity check!