Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What code level should be the target? #7

Open
geoffmcl opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

What code level should be the target? #7

geoffmcl opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Owner

This is for sure a Win32 only project, and there have been many releases of MSVC... see MSVC... and others...

Since we are in a growing WIN64 world, then per that wiki, since we are targeting both x86 - 32-bit, and x64 - 64-bit, as per the notepad++ releases, then Visual C++ 2005 (also known as Visual C++ 8.0) has to be the minimum target...

Now I personally do not have that older version installed in my current main machine, but I do have MSVC2010 aka MSVC 10.0 aka _MSC_VER 1600 aka msvc100 installed, and running, so this will be my yardstick...

If others have earlier versions to do a test compile, then would really appreciate feedback... often it is a simple change...

This is a simple Tidy2.dll Plugin project, for notepad++. and it should address the widest user base... feedback very welcome... thanks...

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Owner Author

But an /MT build, ie USE_STATIC_RUNTIME:BOOL=ON also requires an equivalent libtidy static build... UGH...

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Owner Author

Drat, the comment on commit 149e108 should read v2.0.5... oh, well...

This 2.0.5 looks like a good release candidate... will generate 4 releases, 32 and 64 bit, by MSVC10 and MSVC14... will have to leave the static runtime /MT until later...

@geoffmcl
Copy link
Owner Author

See the latest release... Enjoy...

Also added static run-time, /MT, see -mt, 2 releases, 32 and 64 bits... these versions should not require any MSVC runtimes installed, but look forward to feedback...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant