Jenkins views: fix some job names

[scpeters]

Changes some ignition_gazebo to gz_sim and other ignition_ to gz_.

UPDATE:

I've added many more changes since that first commit. There are still some issues:

• Some windows CI builds are missing for Fortress
• The _dsl_gazebo_libs job doesn't seem to generate any focal builds for the citadel branches

[j-rivero]

One of the reasons to implement the issue #1010 is to be able to generate all the collections set of jobs programmatically and do not hardcode values anymore. The implement still lacks of the -install- jobs to be able to replace the views in this PR but can provide all the ci-branch related job names in a log file together with the type of job and the collection. This is the current log https://gist.github.com/j-rivero/7c3468bae2e9ee39497131715c6add82.

It is easy to alpha-sort + grep that generated log file so two options:

• Just copy/paste the alpha-order of all ci-branch and move the -install- jobs after. It will change current order and make things more difficult to human-read but would be great for completeness.
• We leave the PR as it is and wait unlit the -install- jobs generation to replace it completely.

Whatever you prefer @scpeters

[scpeters]

One of the reasons to implement the issue #1010 is to be able to generate all the collections set of jobs programmatically and do not hardcode values anymore.

ooh, I love this! 💯

The implement still lacks of the -install- jobs to be able to replace the views in this PR but can provide all the ci-branch related job names in a log file together with the type of job and the collection. This is the current log https://gist.github.com/j-rivero/7c3468bae2e9ee39497131715c6add82.

It is easy to alpha-sort + grep that generated log file so two options:

• Just copy/paste the alpha-order of all ci-branch and move the -install- jobs after. It will change current order and make things more difficult to human-read but would be great for completeness.
• We leave the PR as it is and wait unlit the -install- jobs generation to replace it completely.

I think I will paste the values from your gist into this branch just to get working views again, and then we can deprecate the explicit list for the auto-generated views

[scpeters]

to the best of my ability, I've manually updated the job names to match the gist that @j-rivero listed in #1079 (comment). So this currently matches the names generated by our DSL jobs. We can discuss what we would like them to be named and work on auto-generating the views, but I think this PR could be merged as a short-term fix for the views

[j-rivero]

We can discuss what we would like them to be named and work on auto-generating the views, but I think this PR could be merged as a short-term fix for the views

Agree. LGTM