Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do we want to support defined sets of components/records? #28

Open
Relequestual opened this issue Jul 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Do we want to support defined sets of components/records? #28

Relequestual opened this issue Jul 6, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member

Relequestual commented Jul 6, 2018

(Asked by @fschiettecatte in #23)

Additionally, do we want to define sets of components for certain communitites like MME?

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member Author

-Do we want to support defined sets of components/records for certain communities (MME)?

I don't think so. Ideally we don't separate by community. But let the hosts in the network simply return "not supported" as appropriate of simply ignore. Not sure which is better (noisy vs unpredictable)
(@harindra-a - Migrated)

@Relequestual
Copy link
Member Author

While I plan to create a set of components from the MME format, I don't know if theres any value in grouping them together to identify them as MME components.

However, there may be some value in identifying groups of components as likely or recomended to be used together. I think we will be able to have a more informed discussion after the initial release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant