Are you guys going to every fully support the fish shell?

[jdsjdk]

I've already viewed the closed tickets, and from what I can see in the documentation and here on github issues, it's seems that the stance in one form or another is: "this is for the fish shell developers to fix" but for example, when I tried using bass, I got an error - something about -U not working.... either way, I going to create an issue there so they can work on it. So I'm not sure if you guys are planning on supporting the fish shell, but it would be awesome if you either currently are, or are or planning to. For example, I'm on CentOS 9 right now, and I'm tryin to get keychain to work on CentOS. I'm just trying to figure out if your software will work with the fish shell, or should I completely abandon this notion entirely and just go with This github action for trying to get my code to remotely sync instead of dealing with all of this craziness of shell scripting to get webhooks to work.
Either way, I'd like to get this repo almost a the level of the "Apple keychain" if that's possible - and to make it work with the fish shell would be amazing!!
Please let me know guys, thanks.

[sascha-wi]

Nobody interested working on this here. If somebody has an ssh gpg alternative to this software, post it here please.