We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The discussion about suporting more storage backends has been sitting there for a while now #153, #255
The main blocker is that it requires an async api to the storage as both localForage and chrome.storage.local have an async api.
localForage
chrome.storage.local
To not have breaking changes we would need to support both sync and async apis and a clear path to let the users migrate to the async api.
Join the discussion: #338
Refs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The discussion about suporting more storage backends has been sitting there for a while now #153, #255
The main blocker is that it requires an async api to the storage as both
localForage
andchrome.storage.local
have an async api.To not have breaking changes we would need to support both sync and async apis and a clear path to let the users migrate to the async api.
Join the discussion: #338
Refs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: