You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When it comes to generate a static site out of .MD files compelling alternatives exist, such as Hugo and Gatsby, but I decided not to change the technology I use to write this blog.
In fact I see some advantages in the GitHub pages + Jeckyll combo that for my use case outweigh the cons:
I don't have to manage the build/deploy pipeline
It allowed me to experiment with Visual studio containers
technology gain in marginal (reference to Peopleware book)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GitHub pages natively supports Jekyll as a statice site generator.
When it comes to generate a static site out of .MD files compelling alternatives exist, such as Hugo and Gatsby, but I decided not to change the technology I use to write this blog.
In fact I see some advantages in the GitHub pages + Jeckyll combo that for my use case outweigh the cons:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: