Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why I choose to stick with Jeckyll #18

Open
fstasi opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Why I choose to stick with Jeckyll #18

fstasi opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@fstasi
Copy link
Owner

fstasi commented Sep 1, 2022

GitHub pages natively supports Jekyll as a statice site generator.

When it comes to generate a static site out of .MD files compelling alternatives exist, such as Hugo and Gatsby, but I decided not to change the technology I use to write this blog.

In fact I see some advantages in the GitHub pages + Jeckyll combo that for my use case outweigh the cons:

  • I don't have to manage the build/deploy pipeline
  • It allowed me to experiment with Visual studio containers
  • technology gain in marginal (reference to Peopleware book)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant