Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

F.2d start date looks wrong, possibly others? #182

Open
mlissner opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

F.2d start date looks wrong, possibly others? #182

mlissner opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mlissner
Copy link
Member

I was just playing with the citation finder on CourtListener, and it failed to return a top result for this query:

https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=941%20F.2d%20309&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Published=on

That looks up 941 F.2d 309, and the reason that didn't find results is because the case is from 1991, while the key for F.2d says 1993:

"F.2d": {
    "end": "1993-12-31T00:00:00",
    "start": "1924-01-01T00:00:00"
},

So either the case is wrong (I haven't double checked) or reporters-db is wrong. Furthermore, it looks like we don't have the date-level granularity on the fields (it says Dec. 31 and Jan 1), so that'd be nice to fix.

Probably something we can do programmatically from the database, and that we might even be able to easily do for all keys in reporters DB?

@flooie flooie moved this to General Backlog in Case Law Sprint Nov 19, 2024
@flooie flooie moved this from General Backlog to Buffer Zone in Case Law Sprint Jan 14, 2025
@flooie flooie moved this from Buffer Zone to Feb 10 to Feb 21 in Case Law Sprint Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Status: Feb 10 to Feb 21
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant