Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GUI is too slow #1

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

GUI is too slow #1

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

While the actual disassembler is quite fast, the GUI is very slow and thus 
working with larger files isn't fun. See 
[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20151701/swing-text-api-override-labelview-w
ith-different-string-length here] for more information on the issue.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 11 May 2014 at 6:45

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 11 May 2014 at 6:46

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

> the GUI is very slow

They why develop it in Java in the first place? Why not Python + Qt? ;-)

Original comment by [email protected] on 8 Sep 2014 at 10:43

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Good point :-) I needed a scriptable disassembler for my master thesis as our 
work group didn't want to buy a license for IDA Pro just for my project. But 
since I really needed the disassembler for some proofs, this project had to be 
finished rather quickly - hence I chose a language where scripting suppport 
would be really easy. I've integrated Python support into a C++ project before 
(using Boost.Python) and thus knew I would have to write boiler-plate code to 
export classes and methods to Python. In Java, there is no need for that due to 
its runtime reflection support.

But I still agree, given more time I would actually have chosen Qt :-)

Original comment by [email protected] on 9 Sep 2014 at 6:11

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant