Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forti-Analyzer issues on template #67

Open
ManikantaNandyala opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Forti-Analyzer issues on template #67

ManikantaNandyala opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@ManikantaNandyala
Copy link

Hi Team,

The provided Fortigate AutoScale templates are going to create a new Forti-Analyzer while deploying for every deployment

  1. Instead of creating a new Forti-Analyzer for repeated usage of the Autoscale Fortigate Template we need to map the existing Forti-analyzer.

  2. Auto-Scaled Fortigate Firewalls dynamically should get authenticate automatically from the Forti-Analyzer as well as FortiGate Firewall, instead of authenticating manually.

  3. Once the authenticated FortiGate firewalls move to the respective ADOM in Forti-Analyzer.

@JaydenLiang
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Team,

The provided Fortigate AutoScale templates are going to create a new Forti-Analyzer while deploying for every deployment

  1. Instead of creating a new Forti-Analyzer for repeated usage of the Autoscale Fortigate Template we need to map the existing Forti-analyzer.
  2. Auto-Scaled Fortigate Firewalls dynamically should get authenticate automatically from the Forti-Analyzer as well as FortiGate Firewall, instead of authenticating manually.
  3. Once the authenticated FortiGate firewalls move to the respective ADOM in Forti-Analyzer.

We will add support for point 1. I'll create a separate issue for it and please monitor it then.

Please clarify point 2 and 3.

@ManikantaNandyala
Copy link
Author

ManikantaNandyala commented Aug 19, 2021

image

Refer to the above image to understand the requirements.

  1. Newly Scaled Fortigate Firewalls in the Autoscale cluster should get authenticate automatically from the Forti-Analyzer & vice versa i.e Fortigate Firewall.

  2. After authenticating the newly scaled FW to the Forti-Analyzer, by default, it will move the root ADOM in the Forti-Analyzer but the requirement is to move the authenticated Firewalls to respective ADOM in Forti-Analyzer based on the tag or CIDR range of the FW AutoScale Cluster VPC.

Example:- Refer to the image above.

FW Cluster-1 AutoScale VPC CIDR Range is 10.1.0.0/24 should be mapped with Forti-Analyzer ADOM FW Cluster-1 Adom

@JaydenLiang
Copy link
Contributor

image

Refer to the above image to understand the requirements.

  1. Newly Scaled Fortigate Firewalls in the Autoscale cluster should get authenticate automatically from the Forti-Analyzer & vice versa i.e Fortigate Firewall.
  2. After authenticating the newly scaled FW to the Forti-Analyzer, by default, it will move the root ADOM in the Forti-Analyzer but the requirement is to move the authenticated Firewalls to respective ADOM in Forti-Analyzer based on the tag or CIDR range of the FW AutoScale Cluster VPC.

Example:- Refer to the image above.

FW Cluster-1 AutoScale VPC CIDR Range is 10.1.0.0/24 should be mapped with Forti-Analyzer ADOM FW Cluster-1 Adom

Hi @ManikantaNandyala , thank you for your diagram.
Can you try to write an automation script facilitating the Using the Command Line Interface?
This script can interact directly with the FortiAnalyzer / FortiManager.
Since you will need to maintain the whole set of peering VPCs where each VPC has a specific IP range, it is much easier for you to design the behaviours of grouping your devices into the right ADOM using such script as an external supporting tool to the Autoscale.

@ManikantaNandyala
Copy link
Author

@JaydenLiang We are expecting the default script/template for this use case from fortinet, based on our requirements we will amend the changes to interact directly with the FAZ & FMG.

@JaydenLiang
Copy link
Contributor

This script is an add-on to the Autoscale project. @ManikantaNandyala , we are following up with your expected solution in another communication channel.

We are not going to make this add-on a built-in feature for the project but I'll leave this issue open for any possible solution in this way (aka: as an add-on).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants