Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create the official link of version of software bill of materials of Fluentd #481

Open
cosmo0920 opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@cosmo0920
Copy link
Contributor

cosmo0920 commented Dec 4, 2023

Describe the bug

For creating a document which is related to the security contexts, we have to present the software bill of materials.
Without this type of documents, the newbies, who wants to grasp security aspects, didn't get understand about it.

ref: https://edu.chainguard.dev/open-source/sbom/what-makes-a-good-sbom/

Link to the problematic documentation

None. There is no articles for it.

Expected explanation

This SBOM receipt can be generated by docker sbom easily for now.

ref: https://docs.docker.com/engine/sbom/

The description of software bill of material is:
https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/howto_guide_for_sbom_generation_v1.pdf

Additional context

Currently, the SBOM files can be created by:

#!/bin/bash
set -eu

FLUENTD_IMAGE="fluent/fluentd:v1.16.3-debian-amd64-1.0"

docker sbom "$FLUENTD_IMAGE" --output /tmp/"$FLUENTD_IMAGE.spdx.json" --format spdx-json
docker sbom "$FLUENTD_IMAGE" --output /tmp/"$FLUENTD_IMAGE.cyclonedx.json" --format cyclonedx-json
@cosmo0920
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Nihal-Rahman If you need to add more discussion and requirements, could you add your requirements here, please?

@Nihal-Rahman
Copy link

Hi Hiroshi besides the SBOM and any further feedback from other mainters, I don't believe we have any further documents required. The OpenSFF mentioned in our discussion on github is a security standard met by Fluentd correct?

@cosmo0920
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes. Fluentd fulfilled security standard which should be mentioned from OpenSSF.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants