-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing template instantiation of conservativeAdvancement
for RSS/OBBRSS
#297
Comments
geoynomous
added a commit
to geoynomous/fcl
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2018
Now partial template instantiation are available for RSS/OBBRSS which resemble the situation of 0.5.0 where MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNodeRSS/OBBRSS are used and not MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNode The later refitting the whole tree, while the former two only work with transformations locally stored in the node. Refactors code to avoid duplication resolves flexible-collision-library#297
geoynomous
added a commit
to geoynomous/fcl
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2018
Now partial template instantiation are available for RSS/OBBRSS which resemble the situation of 0.5.0 where MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNodeRSS/OBBRSS are used and not MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNode The later refitting the whole tree, while the former two only work with transformations locally stored in the node. Refactors code to avoid duplication resolves flexible-collision-library#297
geoynomous
added a commit
to geoynomous/fcl
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2018
Now partial template instantiation are available for RSS/OBBRSS which resemble the situation of 0.5.0 where MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNodeRSS/OBBRSS are used and not MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNode The later refitting the whole tree, while the former two only work with transformations locally stored in the node. Refactors code to avoid duplication resolves flexible-collision-library#297
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It uses the instantiation of with
const BVHModel<BV>&
,but then this is used as node
MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNode<BV> node;
and not
MeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNodeRSS<BV> node;
orMeshConservativeAdvancementTraversalNodeOBBRSS<BV> node;
The two later one works thread-safe while the previous one does not as its
initialize
refits the tree.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: