Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing license #68

Open
Tanja-4732 opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Missing license #68

Tanja-4732 opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@Tanja-4732
Copy link

Hi 👋

Please consider adding a LICENSE.md or a LICENSE file to your repo to let people know how the code is licensed, or state in your README that it's proprietary.

Good choices are

  • AGPL (very copy-left, preferable)
  • Apache 2 (permissive, should allow for an open-core model)

Please consult your legal people for a good choice.

Expected behavior

A license file in the repo root

Observed behavior

A confusing non-standard license at vscode/LICENSE.

How are "Non-Commercial Use", "No Modification", and "No Redistribution" supposed to work for an open-source app?


Effects

This extension is supposed to replace the MIT-licensed "crates" extension.
But this license appears to be proprietary.

Please fix.

@MOzanGul MOzanGul added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants