GitHub Workflow

[jema28]

Travis: I noticed your most recent PRs have failing travis tests. I would fix this as your master branch should always have working code. Is travis something I can help with?

Issues: Good use of labels! 💯This could be improved for a client project though to include timeboxing e.g. T1d or T4h, and awaiting-review for your QA. It makes it much easier to see what you're expecting.

PRs

1. It isn't automatically clear what some of the PRs are referring to e.g. "making pages". It's good practice to write a descriptive title short summary in the description (for you to look back on and for the QA to read).
2. I would also include a link to the relevant issue that goes into more detail.

[developess]

The tests are working now! Rejoice!

I deffo agree on PRs, they could be a lot better! We've also not been good linking to issues as there are so many issues and a lot of them have been duplicates / cover loads of things 😱