Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C - Wallet Unit Attestation (WUA) and key attestation #333

Open
phin10 opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

C - Wallet Unit Attestation (WUA) and key attestation #333

phin10 opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Discussion Topic This issue represents an ARF Discussion topic

Comments

@phin10
Copy link
Contributor

phin10 commented Nov 27, 2024

Description
Define high-level requirements for WUA as defined in the IAs of article 5a, and for the key attestation.

Planned publication discussion paper
5 February 2025

Link to discussion paper
link will follow

Links to discussion thread(s)
link will follow

Discussion close
Three weeks later.

@phin10 phin10 moved this to Planned in ARF Roadmap Nov 27, 2024
@phin10 phin10 added the Discussion Topic This issue represents an ARF Discussion topic label Nov 27, 2024
@david-bakker
Copy link
Contributor

david-bakker commented Dec 3, 2024

@sander
Copy link

sander commented Dec 17, 2024

The published implementing acts only seem to describe WUA, not WIA and WTE. Are WIA and WTE types of WUA?

@david-bakker
Copy link
Contributor

@sander: Correct. Consequently, ARF 1.5 has merge WTE and WIA into WUA. The idea is that a WUA is an attestation that complies with ISO/IEC 18013-5 and/or SD-JWT VC and therefore is selectively disclosable. Towards an Attestation Provider, the Wallet Unit will present the complete WUA (in the OpenID4VCI protocol). Towards an RP, in principle only the revocation information will be released.

(All of this to be discussed as part of this topic.)

@paulbastian
Copy link

paulbastian commented Dec 17, 2024

Hi @david-bakker This may introduce correlation risks and is not quite the direction that experts and standards are going in OpenID4VCI. The differentiation into WIA and WTE actually makes a lot of sense because they are about different things and many parties have followed this direction already.

@david-bakker
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @paulbastian: Thanks for your comment; we will make sure it is reflected in the discussion of this topic with the Member States.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Topic This issue represents an ARF Discussion topic
Projects
Status: Planned
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants