Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transitioning to monitorism for an OP chain with fault proofs #1021

Open
krofax opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 — with Slack · 0 comments
Open

Transitioning to monitorism for an OP chain with fault proofs #1021

krofax opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 — with Slack · 0 comments

Comments

Copy link
Contributor

krofax commented Oct 23, 2024

For #1
Fault Proofs allow users to permissionlessly submit and challenge the proposals about the state of an OP Stack chain that are used to prove withdrawals.”

Circle’s less concerning about bridging to Ethereum. Because the bridged/wrapped USDC is not Circle’s asset.
Is that the reason why it’s not impacting Circle? (namely, Circle don’t need to care about fault proofs)

Slack Message

@krofax krofax changed the title The role of the Proposer and Sequencer in fault proofs. Transitioning to monitorism for an OP chain with fault proofs Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant