You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the infectee_id and sim_id columns are swapped in the return value of simulate_chains. The first column below is the simulation (or index case) running form 1 to 3. The second one is the ID fo the infectee within each simulation.
I also wonder, in line with the terminology used in the documentation (and argument names) whether it would be clearer if the sim_id column was renamed to index_case.
Thanks for picking this up @sbfnk. This issue is related to #175, so I'll address them jointly. I agree that it would make more sense to make the following changes:
infectee_id -> index_case
sim_id -> infectee
infector_id -> infector
I'll remove the _id suffix as it's redundant. This will also prepare {epichains} for the suggestion in {simulist} to align outputs: epiverse-trace/simulist#43 (comment).
Please place an "x" in all the boxes that apply
I think the
infectee_id
andsim_id
columns are swapped in the return value ofsimulate_chains
. The first column below is the simulation (or index case) running form 1 to 3. The second one is the ID fo the infectee within each simulation.I also wonder, in line with the terminology used in the documentation (and argument names) whether it would be clearer if the
sim_id
column was renamed toindex_case
.Created on 2024-03-26 with reprex v2.1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: