Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Calculate repeat expansion of RFC1 #135

Closed
vroni opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Calculate repeat expansion of RFC1 #135

vroni opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@vroni
Copy link

vroni commented Jan 25, 2024

I have tried the wf-human-variation on a few of our samples and there is no calculation of the repeat expansion of the RFC1 locus. The other loci are calculated as expected.
RFC1 does not show up in the str-report and does not appear in the wf_str.straglr.tsv output file. However, when looking at the code I can see that RFC1 is configured correctly in the wf_str_repeats.bed regions file as well as the variant_catalog_hg38.json annotation file. I was not able to find anything in the code that pointed to an exclusion of the region but I am wondering if there is a deliberate omission within the nextflow workflow of RFC1 that I am not seeing?

According to this GitHub Issue it looks like the straglr developers have already considered RFC1 and implemented for the locus.

@vroni vroni added the question Further information is requested label Jan 25, 2024
@vlshesketh
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vroni thank you for reporting this. We are aware that there is an issue reporting the repeat expansion on RFC1 and will update with a fix shortly.

@vroni
Copy link
Author

vroni commented Jan 26, 2024

Perfect, thanks. I'm looking forward to the update and will try it when it is available.

@vlshesketh
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vroni, we have released a new version of the workflow, v1.11.0, containing an update to straglr which allows RFC1 repeats to be called. Please let us know if you experience any further issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants