Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use different feedin ts for pv_ground_vertical_bifacial #116

Open
nesnoj opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Use different feedin ts for pv_ground_vertical_bifacial #116

nesnoj opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement 🚀 New feature or request

Comments

@nesnoj
Copy link
Contributor

nesnoj commented May 2, 2024

Currently we use sequences/solar-pv_ground_profile from oemof datapackage for all PV ground. However, a different timeseries for pv_ground_vertical_bifacial needs to be integrated (for pv_ground_elevated the existing solar-pv_ground_profile is ok).

@henhuy
Do we need separate components for PV ground in the esys or can we overlay both timeseries on-the-fly (weighted)?

@nesnoj nesnoj added the enhancement 🚀 New feature or request label May 2, 2024
@henhuy
Copy link
Contributor

henhuy commented May 2, 2024

Don't know if I fully understand the question.
For django-oemof it is no problem to update profiles on runtime, BUT as we want to use TSAM aggregated timeseries, timeseries have to be aggregated and stored in DP beforehand.
We could have multiple DPs prepared and select DP for simulation depending on user settings, if this helps?
Don't know how many DPs we need in this case?!

@nesnoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

nesnoj commented May 2, 2024

I see, so the only option seems to be adding separate pv_ground_... components incl. profiles to the esys.
Which would require adjusting the mapping between backend and sim

@henhuy
Copy link
Contributor

henhuy commented May 2, 2024

You are right - but this would be a small change IMO (one extra line or something).
As you can see #117 I have to revisit EE calculation anyway.
But @srhbrnds has to rerun TSAM for us as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement 🚀 New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants