You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fuzzing is related to property-based testing but is its own separate thing.
We should not confuse people with weird naming (compared to the rest of the world).
Our "fuzz tests" are really property-based tests
Our "fuzzers" could be(?) generators, arbitraries, parsers. Maybe some other community found a better name. (Hypothesis has Strategies but the author hates that name in retrospect.)
This would need a major version bump, as well as changes to the runners.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just to explicitly point at it: your suggestion would change the order of arguments to Test.fuzz (from fuzzer,label,fn to label,fuzzer,fn). I like that change though - I'm a bit annoyed at the label not being the first currently.
Going against my conviction, I'll also note the original order could support something like Test.forall someFuzzer "some property".
Fuzzing is related to property-based testing but is its own separate thing.
We should not confuse people with weird naming (compared to the rest of the world).
Our "fuzz tests" are really property-based tests
Our "fuzzers" could be(?) generators, arbitraries, parsers. Maybe some other community found a better name. (Hypothesis has Strategies but the author hates that name in retrospect.)
This would need a major version bump, as well as changes to the runners.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: