Jekyll Rewrite #2674
Replies: 7 comments 4 replies
-
I've always thought it was a bit odd that there's a small section of "docs" on the website. That definitely seems like something that could be in its own repo since its essentially just powered by GitBook(?) and looks totally different. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sweet! This will be super nice and something we totally want to do. One thing to do during this rewrite is update the CSS and templates to match our more modern style from the blog site. Update on the dynamic parts:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Re: team page, if we still want to do something dynamic it would probably be much more accurate to use GitHub as the source of truth here. There are a lot of people in Slack that are outside collaborators or just have gone inactive etc. The GitHub teams are more likely to be kept up to date and accurate since it reflects who has repo access and not just who is in a chat room |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just finished setting up the Privacy page. I took liberty of updating the browsers listed there, adding a new one (Brave), updating Edge to the Chromium-based one, and removing Midori and IE, since IE doesn't even show up in Plausible stats anyway, and I think Midori isn't a thing anymore? I also think reusing existing translations from Weblate won't be really doable sadly, unless it's done manually. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@cassidyjames I know you were making initial drafts for the home page design. One possibility to keep in mind: I wrote the theming to theoretically support changing accent colors dynamically. So if you'd like to highlight this feature (alongside dark mode) we could add this changing of the accent color in the website as a novelty. It's something I've seen on the Pop_OS website (for dark mode toggle) which was a fun detail :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So, I've been looking into integrating Weblate with this new project and it looks like it can be integrated easily. However, setting up an FOSS repo there seems to have some an approval process that's not really worth it on my prototype repo. Is there any interest in bringing the project in its current state into the elementary organization? It would also allow to start working on the Team page, since if the plan is to use the GitHub API, it requires the organization access to fetch the data. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am having trouble finding the time to work on this 😥️ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've been working on and off for the past few months on a rewrite of the current website, made with Jekyll. It's the same technology used on the blog/AppCenter site, and being static, is very performant.
The current website looks and feels pretty good to the user. Quoting what @danrabbit said on Twitter once, it "does a good job of hiding the mess underneath". Still, I believe it is in the best interest of the project to get to the point of starting fresh eventually, and with the imminent release of Odin, it would be good timing.
Reasons to drop the current PHP-based project of the main website:
Current dynamic functionalities
Now, the website has some dynamic functionalities that we'd need to pay attention to, since it'll become a static website. They are:
What I've already done
I have created a public repo to work on this. It is setup with a GH Action to publish it to GitHub Pages, on a subdomain I own. The live enviroment can be checked out here.
I've kept in mind the stack currently being used in other sites, and worked on making the code as clean as possible. Also, I've tried to stay true to the styles of the current website, specially regarding typography. I also kept the buttons/inputs in the same styles, but I expect them to be changed if the site is to mimic the OS's stylesheet redesign.
I've been in touch with @cassidyjames a while ago about this and, since there will likely by a redesign of the home page, haven't worked on that one at all. What's currently done and working is:
What I'd really like to do soon is see how to integrate this with Weblate, and see if we can salvage the existing translations from it.
What do you think?
I'm opening this discussion to see what the team thinks of the idea and what I've worked on so far. This way we can work out any issues, and hopefully if this goes forward, attract the attention of someone to help me out with this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions