Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix security vulnerabilities in remrem component #201

Open
jainadc9 opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Fix security vulnerabilities in remrem component #201

jainadc9 opened this issue Jun 21, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jainadc9
Copy link
Contributor

jainadc9 commented Jun 21, 2022

Description

Description

Given the security compliance , REM component should adhere to it.

Applicable dependencies:
Uplift of gson to 2.8.9 or later
Uplift of Jackson-databind to 2.13.3
Or more If required

Acceptance Criteria:
All security related components uplifted to the latest versions.
Test cases verified for the changes done
Function test cases verified for the changes done.

Motivation

To overcome security issues

Exemplification

Benefits

Vulnerability free code

Possible Drawbacks

@jainadc9 jainadc9 changed the title Fix EVMS vulneribilities in remrem component Fix EVMS vulnerabilities in remrem component Jun 21, 2022
@jainadc9 jainadc9 changed the title Fix EVMS vulnerabilities in remrem component Fix security vulnerabilities in remrem component Jun 22, 2022
@m-linner-ericsson
Copy link
Member

@jainadc9 Is this issue still valid?

@jainadc9
Copy link
Contributor Author

It can be closed @m-linner-ericsson

@m-linner-ericsson
Copy link
Member

@jainadc9 Do you have a reference to the PR?

@z-sztrom
Copy link
Contributor

z-sztrom commented Jun 18, 2024

The libraries were uplifted by eiffel-community/eiffel-remrem-parent#31 and eiffel-community/eiffel-remrem-parent#29, cca 2 years ago.

The issue can be closed.

@z-sztrom z-sztrom self-assigned this Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants