-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Group Model Order Strategies (mwr thesis). #1021
Open
soerendomroes
wants to merge
59
commits into
eclipse:master
Choose a base branch
from
soerendomroes:sdo/mwr-mt
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…pse#957) * radial: Correctly use half of the node node spacing as padding. * radial: Correct recursive remvoe overlap.
* layered: Correctly insert nodes during df model order layering. * layering: DF MO layering: Fix placement of marked nodes
…#900) * wip, does not work, targetplatform bad. * Updated java, xtend and tycho versions in pom * Removed java 8 from workflow. * Try new java versions. * Only try java 11. * Fixed build issue. * Added Java 17 to CI build. * Add Java 17 and node 18 to elkjs version checks.
This reverts commit c29b48a.
This reverts commit 988e578.
This reverts commit 1c9f1f7.
* update notice information * remove outdated information, add further links
* Git purge 1.8 Java. * Fixed build issue, maybe a partition tests fails.
Closed
The SCC group model order id is still applied statically. Can this be done programmatically?
the previous layer. Updated WEST side handling to fix this and fixed typo as well and makes port model order non constraining for input ports.
'originsdo/sdo/fixModelOrderPortCalculation' into sdo/mwr-mt
…g/layered/options/LayeredMetaDataProvider.java
…g/layered/options/LayeredOptions.java
I could solve this maybe by doing the inversePortProcessor after this.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a lot of new cycle breakers and group model order for crossing minimizing.