You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the debate whether yes or no Bayesian analyses could/should be "corrected" for multiple testing, comparisons and false positives, this suggests extending the null control method (implemented in JASP):
These "adjustments" are for the prior odds between pairs/sets of hypotheses (not for any of the measures of evidence).
How would you like to see these implemented?
(Personally not a fan of these "let me tell you what your priors are" tools 😅)
I don't think this is an avenue worth perusing (see previous comment about defining others' priors).
But if you are interested in such methods of default priors, you might also want to take a look at the BAS package, which computes term-wise adjusted priors.
In the debate whether yes or no Bayesian analyses could/should be "corrected" for multiple testing, comparisons and false positives, this suggests extending the null control method (implemented in JASP):
Null_Control_Jong.pdf
It would be nice to make something like that available in bayestestR
Could interest @mattansb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: