Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why execArgv is by default not process.execArgv ? #54

Open
3hedgehogs opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Why execArgv is by default not process.execArgv ? #54

3hedgehogs opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@3hedgehogs
Copy link

Had migrated to new version of this library 1.0.0
and I have noticed that by default execArgv is empty array that causes errors with "simple" replacement and nonintuitive.
@3hedgehogs 3hedgehogs changed the title Why execArgv is by default is not process.execArgv ? Why execArgv is by default not process.execArgv ? Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@3hedgehogs