Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ambiguity in 7.1.4.2.2.j #3

Open
mhashe opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Ambiguity in 7.1.4.2.2.j #3

mhashe opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mhashe
Copy link

mhashe commented Aug 24, 2023

The section states that:

[T]he jurisdiction for the applicable Incorporating Agency or Registration Agency at the locality level MUST include the country and state or province information, ..., as well as the locality information.

But also, that:

These fields MUST NOT contain information that is not relevant to the level of the Incorporating Agency or Registration Agency.

There is some empirical ambiguity on how this should be handled for (e.g.) city-states - should state or province information be included, because the first clause implies that inclusion? or should it be omitted because there is no relevant state or province?

The VMCR's should clarify the proper interpretation in this case. It has been mentioned that this may be applicable to the EVG's, SBR's as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant