You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently two separate lists are utilized, which makes pagination of them very difficult, if not impossible, so far as I know. In order to get around this problem, we can simply compile them into one listing, with a flag as to whether or not the record was inserted or deleted in front of each entry. Probably color coded in order to make it easier to read. It'd probably be best to have things done this way, anyway, as the inserted entry will be more easily comparable to the deleted/archived entries that it is applicable to.
Honestly, now that I think about how much easier it will be to compare the records of deleted vs. inserted, I think that this should probably have the highest priority en route to #131 right now, in order to increase the ease of debugging.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently two separate lists are utilized, which makes pagination of them very difficult, if not impossible, so far as I know. In order to get around this problem, we can simply compile them into one listing, with a flag as to whether or not the record was inserted or deleted in front of each entry. Probably color coded in order to make it easier to read. It'd probably be best to have things done this way, anyway, as the inserted entry will be more easily comparable to the deleted/archived entries that it is applicable to.
Honestly, now that I think about how much easier it will be to compare the records of deleted vs. inserted, I think that this should probably have the highest priority en route to #131 right now, in order to increase the ease of debugging.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: